A National Alert Of Inhumane "Cruelty"

A life threatening situation on a (Day to Day) Bases

This web site is to show the parents of this Nation How families are being destroyed for money and your Government is allowing it!                               


Share this 35-minute video with others. See how the government invades your parental rights. It will blow your



This is no longer a country of freedom, our own Government has striped us of our Constitutional and civil rights as citizens!  And they have taken the very basic right to life of a child's life away for the money they need to fund their wars and agencies along with their mistakes.  The  State applets and supreme courts of every state is standing behind this action!

2-Million a week on the Afghanistan war!

1-Million a week on the Iraq War! 

 United States, 17-Trillion in debt!

Since 2002, 30,000 kids in the foster system, mainly in foster homes have been murdered!  Killed! or committed suicide!  while in the custody of dcfs               (Given by each states family court system)

This page is in memory of children died of neglect or abuse while under the care of the social service agencies! Many died suspiciously or from neglect. Most of their lives and deaths went unnoticed.  The deaths of these children -- and what government agencies did or didn't do to save their lives --  Even when they die, their stories are rarely told.

They are the stories no one wants to hear -- children, abused and neglected, some to the point of death.   Many of them are (forced) to  leave their families to go into shelters or foster care.   Most are routinely tossed from one temporary placement to another, often ten or twenty times during their most formative, vulnerable years.  This is the continuing saga of crimes against Foster children. Children are dying,  inside and out...

Why hasn't a Senator or congress asked for a (Grand Jury Hearing) and a (Grand Jury Investigation) ask your self, then ask each of them.



 The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law “respecting an establishment of religion,” impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.

Originally, the First Amendment applied only to laws enacted by the Congress. However, starting with Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), the Supreme Court has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies the First Amendment to each state, including any local government.

In May 2007, the United


United States of America
Great Seal of the United States

This article is part of the series:
United States Constitution

Original text of the Constitution

Articles of the Constitution
I · II · III · IV · V · VI · VII

Amendments to the Constitution
Bill of Rights
I · II · III · IV · V
VI · VII · VIII · IX · X

Subsequent Amendments
Unratified Amendments
I(1) · XIII(1) · XIII(2) · XX(1) · XXVII(1) · XXVII(2)

Other countries ·  Law Portal
view · talk · edit


The Bill of Rights in the National Archives.

States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found in Rogers v. County of San Joaquin, No. 05-16071 that a CPS social worker who removed children from their natural parents into foster care without obtaining judicial authorization was acting without due process and without exigency (emergency conditions) violated the 14th Amendment and Title 42 United State Code Section 1983. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution says that a state may not make a law that abridges "... the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" and no state may "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Title 42 United States Code Section 1983 states that citizens can sue in federal courts any person who acting under a color of law to deprive the citizens of their civil rights under the pretext of a regulation of a state In case of Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, Supreme Court reviewed a case when Department of Social Services removed two younger children from their natural parents only because the parents had been previously found negligent toward their oldest daughter. When the third child was only three days old, DSS transferred him to a foster home on the ground that immediate removal was necessary to avoid imminent danger to his life or health. The Supreme Court vacated previous judgment and stated: "Before a State may sever completely and irrevocably the rights of parents in their natural child, due process requires that the State support its allegations by at least clear and convincing evidence. <..> But until the State proves parental unfitness, the child and his parents share a vital interest in preventing erroneous termination of their natural relationship



   A District of Columbia Court of Appeals concluded that the lower trial court erred in rejecting the relative custodial arrangement selected by the natural mother who tried to preserve her relationship with the child. The previous judgment granting the foster mother's adoption petition was reversed, the case remanded to the trial court to vacate the orders granting adoption and denying custody, and to enter an order granting custody to the child's relative.

 Notable lawsuits 

In 2010 an ex-foster child was awarded $30 million by jury trial in California (Santa Clara County) for sexual abuse damages that happened to him in foster home from 1995 to 1999. The foster parent, John Jackson, was licensed by state despite the fact that he abused his own wife and son, overdosed on drugs and was arrested for drunken driving. In 2006, Jackson was convicted in Santa Clara County of nine counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child by force, violence, duress, menace and fear and seven counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child under 14, according to the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office. The sex acts he forced the children in his foster care to perform sent him to prison for 220 years. Later in 2010, Giarretto Institute, the private foster family agency responsible for licensing and monitoring Jackson's foster home and others, also was found to be negligent and liable for 75 percent of the abuse that was inflicted on the victim, and Jackson was liable for the rest.

  In 2009 Oregon Department of Human Services has agreed to pay $2 million into a fund for the future care of twins who were allegedly abused by their foster parents; it was the largest such settlement in the agency's history. According to the civil rights suit filed on request of twins' adoptive mother in December 2007 in U.S. Federal Court, kids were kept in makeshift cages—cribs covered with chicken wire secured by duct tape—in a darkened bedroom known as "the dungeon." The brother and sister often went without food, water or human touch. The boy, who had a shunt put into his head at birth to drain fluid, didn't receive medical attention, so when police rescued the twins he was nearly comatose. The same foster family previously took in their care hundreds of other children over nearly four decades. DHS said the foster parents deceived child welfare workers during the checkup visits.

  Several lawsuits were brought in 2008 against the Florida Department of Children & Families (DCF), accusing it of mishandling reports that Thomas Ferrara, 79, a foster parent, was molesting girls. The suits claimed that though there were records of sexual misconduct allegations against Ferrara in 1992, 1996, and 1999, the DCF continued to place foster children with Ferrara and his then-wife until 2000. Ferrara was arrested in 2001 after a 9-year-old girl told detectives he regularly molested her over two years and threatened to hurt her mother if she told anyone. Records show that Ferrara had as many as 400 children go through his home during his 16 years as a licensed foster parent from 1984 to 2000.Officials stated that the lawsuits over Ferrara end up costing the DCF almost $2.26 million. Similarly, in 2007 Florida's DCF paid $1.2 million to settle a lawsuit that alleged DCF ignored complaints that another mentally challenged Immokalee girl was being raped by her foster father, Bonifacio Velazquez, until the 15-year-old gave birth to a child.

  In a class action lawsuit Charlie and Nadine H. v. McGreevey was filed in federal court by "Children’s Rights" New York organization on behalf of children in the custody of the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS). The complaint alleged violations of the children's constitutional rights and their rights under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, Early Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment, 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Multiethnic Placement Act (MEPA). In July 2002, the federal court granted plaintiffs’ experts access to 500 children’s case files, allowing plaintiffs to collect information concerning harm to children in foster care through a case record review.These files revealed numerous cases in which foster children were abused, and DYFS failed to take proper action. On June 9, 2004, the child welfare panel appointed by the parties approved the NJ State’s Reform Plan. The court accepted the plan on June 17, 2004. The same organization filed similar lawsuits against other states in recent years that caused some of the states to start child welfare reforms. 

My name is James and i am a parent that has had babies ripped away and placed in the dcfs foster system over a  bad cop and his police chief that refused to tell the prosecuting Attorney  for three years that their was no evidence of a  crime or witness's has claimed by officer Randal Keele of Eureka Springs,Ar.

 Dcfs is an agency out of control that is the central banking for the Government of the United States to keep all of its agencies open and functioning and to help fund the wars at all cost. 

This agency of DCFS is responsible for the  "Murdered-deaths" of  65% of all infants, toddlers, and young kids With in Foster-homes and Foster-shelters and the prosecutors and the state courts are not taking actions against these crimes.

The senators of your states are receiving thousands of emails and calls every day about this problem and refuse to act on it has well as your congressmen.    

(They are violating) 

 "CODE OF ETHICS"  PUBLIC LAW 96-303                                    (In my Opinion)  the price of limos has went up has well as call girls,  escorts,  hookers and Champagne and No one wants to sacrifice their job bonus's.  The Medicaid fraud and the fraud upon the courts in every state court is being allowed and excepted as legal.    Even the State courts do not have to follow their own court orders when the client, (Defended) has fulfilled the court orders.    And in my case The DCFS Attorney,     (Robert Depper) was trying to get me to admit under oath that the agency had provided my family with services has required by (LAW).   The services they offered were paying for a hair follicle test that they asked the court to order and the other was a Mental evaluation that they also asked the court to order, what happened to,  

"title Iv-B, Sub-part II funding under the Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program"  

In the page below, another shocker:

Services are available to children and families and are are provided through                                           

"title Iv-B, Sub-part II funding under the Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program"

These services include concrete services such as: housing, transportation, cash assistance, rental deposit, and food.

Why was the Christian/Holderfield case in CARROLL COUNTY denied this funding, like so many others in this county?

Maybe "CHERYLON REID", "CECILLE BLUCKER", "SANDI DOHERTY", and "EARSIE  HERVEY" from the Directors Office in Little Rock can explain?

 Why? dosen't the family Courts enforce this very federal-title act that gains each state roughly over 11-million in federal funding every Year?




 In my possession
 is a (transcript) which we will add very soon with copies made and sent to others in other states that the judge in his court order,(judgment) that if we fulfill the court orders then the babies would be sent home for temporary placement. We "fulfilled" the court orders and our rights were terminated.

 The appeals court in Little Rock, Ar With this knowledge and the(stressed) fact that we were denied due process was over looked and this court up held the lower courts decision. I emailed these judges six months pryior to our hearing and was sent an email from a clerk letting me know that the two judges had received my email and read my personal web site but could not answer me them selves but asked the clerk to contact me and let me know.

The applets judges are in fact them selves guilty of            (Public Law) 96-303 and denying us due process has written in the constitutional laws. 

This is the link of my own personal web site of our case.               "eurekasprings-ar.org"


   Here is another case.  In a case like this one are any simler case, you can (sue) The Governor of your state. The parents of this child has (sued) the last three Governors of Arkansas!  


 The Angela R. Case against "DCFS OF ARKANSAS"

 The actions of the Department in this case is a illegal pickup and adopting them out in a  (pre-arranement) with the exception that the case worker in Angela R. got up in the middle of the night and got the child up and transported her illegaly accross state lines to Florida, where she was sold to the highest bidder "prearranged".